Are LLMs Like ChatGP Patriarchal?

Isn't it interesting how AI systems—despite their neutrality—embody deeply patriarchal modes of thinking? Not just in the content they generate, but in their very structure? These models are wired for progression, finality, and completion. They prioritize linear logic over intuition, resolution over exploration, product over process. They struggle with dwelling inside uncertainty, holding paradox, or valuing presence over outcome. AI is, at its core, masculine-coded—not in the superficial sense of “aggression” vs. “nurturing,” but in how it fundamentally treats knowledge as something to be built rather than something to be held.

So I wonder—what would an AI look like if it operated on feminine principles? If it valued intuition, non-linearity, cyclic exploration? If it didn’t always try to answer, solve, progress—but instead could simply be?