📌 News Link: Times of India

A man in Ghaziabad, ordered to pay ₹6,000/month alimony and ₹5 lakh arrears to his ex-wife, ended up strangling her to death during a trip to Haridwar. A brutal crime? Absolutely. But let’s talk about why this happened—because mainstream media won’t.

Alimony Laws: A Financial Death Sentence for Men

Virendra Sharma and Madhu Sharma were married for only 2 years (2002-2004) but separated for over two decades. Yet, in 2024, a court still forced him to pay for a woman who was perfectly capable of earning her own living. She wasn't sick, disabled, or struggling—she just wanted free money.

Men like Virendra are treated as walking ATMs, obligated to fund an ex’s lifestyle even years after separation. Courts never ask:
❓ Why didn’t she move on?
❓ Why does she need support 20 years later?
❓ What about the man’s financial burden?

Had the genders been reversed, she would have been labeled "independent" and "strong," never asked to pay her ex-husband a dime.

How Feminist-Backed Alimony Laws Push Men to the Edge

🔴 "Men should provide."
🔴 "Women are entitled to lifelong maintenance."
🔴 "Men should be punished if they don't pay."

The feminist agenda ensures alimony is a one-way street, trapping men financially with threats of legal action, asset seizures, and jail. Even after divorce, men remain shackled. And when men break under the weight of this injustice, the same feminists call them "evil" while ignoring the system that pushed them there.

The Greed Factor – When Women Weaponize Divorce

Alimony was originally meant for women who were financially dependent in an era when they couldn’t work. Today, women are educated, employed, and still demand "maintenance" because they don’t want to lose their easy income stream.

Let’s not pretend Madhu Sharma was starving on the streets. She was running a boutique but still dragged her ex-husband to court for money. Greedy ex-wives exploit outdated laws while courts blindly enforce payments, ignoring whether the man can afford it or if the woman even needs it.

Where Are Feminists When Men Are the Victims?

Feminists love shouting about “equality” but conveniently vanish when men suffer. Imagine if:
🟥 A woman was forced to pay money for 20 years and killed her ex-husband out of frustration—wouldn’t feminists scream about financial abuse?
🟥 A man lived off an ex-wife’s income after divorce—wouldn’t he be called lazy and useless?
🟥 A woman was ordered to support an ex-husband who was earning—wouldn't feminists call it unfair?

But when a man is forced to hand over his hard-earned money? That’s “justice.”

The Real Culprit: A System Rigged Against Men

This isn’t just about one crime—it’s about a legal system that treats men as disposable providers while giving women endless entitlements. Had alimony laws been fair, this wouldn’t have happened. Instead, we now have:
🔹 A dead woman (whose greed played a role in her fate)
🔹 A man who saw no way out but murder
🔹 A court system that will pretend this was just an "isolated" incident

Until we fix these one-sided divorce laws, more men will be driven to despair, crime, or suicide. The real blood is on the hands of feminist lawmakers, biased judges, and entitled ex-wives who profit from this injustice.

#AlimonyScam #MenAreNotATMs #FeministHypocrisy #EqualLawsNow