Is Sordland’s Autocratic Path a Disaster Waiting to Happen?

Alright, so let’s break this down. The autocratic path sounds pretty sweet on paper, right? I mean, President Rayne gets to flex those executive powers, push through all the reforms, and basically make Sordland great again without some annoying opposition constantly throwing wrenches in the works. No gridlock, no endless debates—just pure, unfiltered progress. Sounds like a dream, doesn’t it?

But here’s the thing: what happens when the honeymoon phase ends? Imagine a crisis hits—economic collapse, a Bludish uprising, or maybe Rumburg decides to get frisky at the border. If people lose faith in Rayne, they might vote in someone way worse. Like, way worse. Picture this: a power-hungry president who’s got all the same decree powers but none of Rayne’s good intentions. They could undo everything Rayne built, and guess what? The Assembly would be totally powerless to stop them. No checks, no balances, just one person calling all the shots. Scary, right?

So, the big question is: can Sordland actually stay stable with the strongest decrees possible? I mean, sure, it might work for a while, but long-term? It feels like playing with fire. One bad leader, and the whole system could go up in flames.

What do you guys think?